The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear an Indiana case on exactly who should have Great Lakes beach access. The case, BOBBIE GUNDERSON, V. STATE OF INDIANA, hoped to settle the question of legally defining the Ordinary High Water Mark on the inland Great Lakes. If SCOTUS took the case, it could have had a far-reaching impact on the entire Great Lakes region.
This means that the lower state courts rulings stand in which the public’s right to access the Great Lake’s shoreline after the U.S. Supreme Court announced Tuesday it was denying a petition to hear an appeal of an Indiana Supreme Court case over the matter.
Get Off My Sand!
The case started in Indiana where in 2012, Bobbie and Donald Gunderson filed suit against the Town of Long Beach for allowing the public to use their beachfront property. The Gunderson’s held the position which they said their property extended to the water’s edge. In 2018 the Indiana Supreme Court disagreed and said their property only came to where the high-water mark usually hits the beach. Indiana’s position is that the state holds beach in trust for public use. Now the case is in front of the highest court of the land and the entire Great Lakes tourism industry is holding their collective breath.
Michigan stands to be impacted the most if the Supreme Court takes the case and agrees with the Plaintiffs. With over 3,200 miles of shoreline, Michigan has the longest freshwater coastline in the US and the second-longest coastline next to Alaska. In 2014 tourist visitors to Michigan spent $22.8 billion, much of that along the state’s shoreline. Mostly on or near a Michigan beach.
Shoreline Cottage Owners Impacted
Michigan’s Tourism Industry Threatened
There was the high potential that the US Supreme Court’s ruling on this case may negate the Michigan Supreme Court ruling on this issue. In 2005, Michigan ruled on Glass v Goeckel, which held that the public had the right to walk along the shores of Michigan’s Great Lakes shoreline on land below the ordinary high-water mark. This land is owned by the state and considered part of the lake bottomlands that are held in trust by citizens for Great Lakes beach access.
Many Wanted the Case Thrown Out
Indiana and many shoreline towns and groups have filed briefs stating that the Supreme Court should not take the case. The original plaintiffs, Bobbie and Donald Gunderson no longer own the beachfront property. The traditionally conservative Mackinac Center for Public Policy wants the high court to take on the case. The Mackinac Center holds the Michigan Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling was unclear and said there are several questions that the Supreme Court could help clarify. They hold that the public trust doctrine erodes property rights for beachfront owners.
If the Supreme Court took the case and ruled against the public trust doctrine for Great Lakes shoreline, Michigan Resorts, Hotels, and Cottage owners that seasonally rent out their beachfront homes may have been being forced to tell their clients to stay put and not walk the beach. Beachfront owners may have been entitled to put fences along with their property right up to the water’s edge to block access.
The Supreme Court Great Lakes Access ramifications were huge and we are relieved that the public trust access standard continues
Questions About Great Lakes Beach Access
Can the public walk my beach property on Lake Huron? – Yes. The public has access to walk the beach or shoreline up to the Ordinary High Water Mark.
- The Problem With Beach Easements
- Lame Duck Politicians Want to Make It Easy to Steal Water
- Beach Use – Shoreline Owners Cannot Prevent Use
- Mackinac Center for Public Policy
- Michigan National Guard Proposes Low Level Combat Training Over Thumb
2 thoughts on “Supreme Court Won’t Take Case to Decide Great Lakes Beach Access”
Oh boy! This one is a doozy! It will be interesting to see what happens. Will you be following up on this article as the case moves along?
Good job distilling this issue. Reasonable lakeshore owners in our Caseville area enjoy meeting shoreline walkers. I, too, like to walk beyond my own lake frontage. What’s not cool is when walkers become near-squatters, trying to set up blankets & chairs, friends and music, soccer games and trysts in sand in front of our home.
A clear ruling would help, but don’t think SCOTUS can be informed enough to help neighbors stay good neighbors.