Michigan Republicans Seek to Politicize and Restrict Michigan DNRs Ability to Manage Public Land


Michigan DNRMichigan State Senators Thomas Casperson (R), Patrick Colbeck, Arlan Meekhof (R) , Judith Emmons (R), and John Pappageorge (R) are seeking to rip the heart out of a successful Michigan Department of Natural Resources program that protects fragile land areas and Michigan’s rich wildlife diversity. Senate bill 1276 was introduced into committee this past week and is expected to be up for a vote in October.

The Effects

If passed the bill would do the following:

·   Prevent the DNR from restoring harvested forested land to its original state. Potentially clear cut land would remain without standing timber.

·   Place an economic value on land under its control. Perhaps for valuation for possible sale in the future.

·   Eliminate the scientific term “natural biological diversity” from the definition of “conservation.”

·   Eliminate a scientific term “unusual flora and fauna” in the definition of “natural area.”

·   Place Michigan’s public land under oversight of the legislators and not the DNR.

This bill would be a catastrophic gutting of one Michigan’s most successful state agencies; the Department of Natural Resourses  (DNR) . It would turn public land use into a political ping pong match between a free for all and total lock down as political fortunes swing from Republican to Democrat.  The bill’s author Tom Casperson feels that the DNRs professional team of naturalists, scientists and botanists that have been in operation since 1921 are now too stupid to manage public land that has the economic potential to be turned into 4×4 off-road playground version of Cedar Point.

Our View

Thumbwind agrees with University of Michigan Professor Emeritus Burt Barnes of the School of Natural Resources and Environment. Dr. Barnes calls the bill “lacking in common sense, ecological literacy, and vision; it is divisive, counterproductive, mean-spirited; couldn’t be worse.”

To paraphrase a quote from Winston Churchill, “this bill needs to be strangled in the cradle”.  Casperson can be sent an email at this  link.

Senate bill seeks to restrict Michigan DNRs ability to manage lands for biodiversity | Michigan Radio.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Michigan Republicans Seek to Politicize and Restrict Michigan DNRs Ability to Manage Public Land”

  1. Question:
    I noticed that references were taken from the Bay City Times last August.
    My question, with all the State facilities, Sleeper, Port Crescent, Rush Lake etc., in Huron County why was there no mention in the local media, HDT, View, WLEW, or at the County level, BOC meetings?
    That said, with the possibility that portions of state land would be for sale perhaps farmers could buy it for acreage they lost with the installation of wind turbine or would wind developers have first choice?
    If I’m mistaken I apologize.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s